Your Electricity Development Pathway, VIC
Published 2026-10-28
This assessment screens a manure-to-electricity pathway for 550 fully housed dairy cows in Victoria, yielding a modelled 1,329 kWh/day. The preferred next investigation is a parasitic load audit and grid connection screen to determine net exportable energy. Changes to manure collection rates or site-specific electrical infrastructure could significantly alter the candidate route. The immediate next action is to confirm the actual manure recovery volume from the specific housing configuration to validate modelled inputs.
Action plan
Confidence 0%
First: Validate feedstock availability by converting cow count to actual daily collected tonnage. / Next: Perform a parasitic load calculation to determine net exportable electricity from the 1,329 kWh/day gross model. / Then: Initiate formal EPA Victoria permission screening under A07b (Small organic waste processing). / Decision gate: Compare net electricity revenue against CAPEX/OPEX estimates once technology is selected.
Developing this pathway in VIC
Confidence 0%
Victoria presents a mature environment for organic waste processing, with 133 public registry records for bioenergy, including 13 specifically matching manure and effluent pathways such as the Ellinbank and Braebrook projects. The regional context is defined by a shift toward methane destruction and energy recovery to meet state emissions targets.
Verify EPA Victoria permission path
- Why it matters for you: Small-scale vs large-scale organic processing (A07a vs A07b) changes your cost and timeframe for approval [VIC-2].
- Evidence needed: Confirmed annual feedstock tonnage processed and digestate management plan [VIC-5].
- Next action: Submit a pre-application enquiry to EPA Victoria regarding A07b status [VIC-4].
- Who confirms it: EPA Victoria.
Evaluate grid connection capacity
- Why it matters for you: Victorian Distribution Network Service Providers (DNSPs) have strict requirements for embedded generation that differ from gas injection [VIC-6].
- Evidence needed: Preliminary Impact Assessment from the local DNSP for the specific connection point.
- Next action: Identify the site-specific DNSP and lodge a basic connection enquiry.
- Who confirms it: Local DNSP (e.g., Powercor, AusNet).
Decision context and declared objective
Confidence 0%
The declared objective is to investigate the development of an electricity generation pathway using collected animal manure from 550 fully housed dairy cows in Victoria. Based on deterministic model results (ecosystem-1.0.0), this herd size corresponds to a production output of 1,329 kWh/day. This brief assesses the electricity route as the primary pathway, acknowledging alternative outputs of 485 Nm³/day of biomethane or 86.8 kg/day of hydrogen from the same gas pool. Current status is early-development; plant type, specific site location, and network connection points remain unresolved. The assessment focuses on the transition from modelled raw output to a verified commercial supply role within the Victorian energy landscape, noting that electricity and gas connection requirements involve distinct infrastructure and regulatory steps.
Commercialisation screen
Confidence 0%
Commercial viability not established. The pathway currently relies on an electricity price assumption of 0.1709 AUD/kWh (ex GST), which generates an indicative gross daily revenue of approximately 227 AUD. However, without CAPEX for the anaerobic digester and CHP unit, or OPEX for manure handling and maintenance, the project cannot proceed to a final investment decision. The recoverable CO2 potential (587 kg/day) is noted, but biogenic CO2 buyer prices are not verified on Shelby and no offtake terms exist. The next task is a preliminary CAPEX estimation for a plant sized for 1,329 kWh/day.
Your next pathway decisions
Confidence 0%
The candidate route focuses on onsite electricity generation, which avoids the high-pressure injection requirements of the biomethane alternative (485 Nm³/day). However, the 1,329 kWh/day figure represents gross production. The commercial viability of this route depends heavily on the unmodelled parasitic load of the anaerobic digester and the efficiency of the chosen generator set.
Assess actual manure recovery
- Why it matters for you: Modelled output assumes a standard collection efficiency that may not match your specific housing and flushing system.
- Evidence needed: Daily dry matter tonnage and volatile solids measurements from the specific 550-cow herd.
- Next action: Conduct a 14-day waste characterisation study on-farm.
- Who confirms it: Independent laboratory or agricultural consultant.
Screen electricity parasitic load
- Why it matters for you: Net exportable power is what drives revenue; the system must power its own pumps and mixers first.
- Evidence needed: Technical specifications for the supported technology envelope (digester and CHP unit).
- Next action: Calculate net energy balance using a proposed plant design.
- Who confirms it: Technology provider or Shelby engineering lead.
Frequently asked questions
Is the 1,329 kWh/day figure guaranteed production?
No, this is a deterministic model output based on 346.75 operating days/year. Actual production depends on manure quality and plant uptime.
Can I sell the 587 kg/day of CO2 mentioned in the alternatives?
While recoverable mass is modelled, commercial viability is not established as CO2 sales prices and offtake terms are currently unverified.
How does the VIC-specific regulatory environment affect this project?
You must navigate EPA Victoria permissions (A07a/b) and specific DNSP connection protocols, which are distinct from other Australian states.
Why is electricity chosen over biomethane injection?
Electricity is the user-declared objective. Biomethane (485 Nm³/day) is a candidate route, but requires different infrastructure and network approvals.
Sources & References
Pre-feasibility research only, not engineering, financial or legal advice or a guarantee of supply, demand or price.
Scan an Opportunity