Workplace Wellbeing Programs Australia | Pilot Pathway | NSW
Explore the research framework for comparing Australian workplace wellbeing programs by need, evidence and implementation fit. Get practical next steps.
Workplace wellbeing programs should be compared against a defined organisational need, work context, delivery capacity and relevant evidence. Shelby is researching that comparison model; it is not currently operating a live directory or claiming that a program can substitute for safe work design, legal duties or professional care.
Compare fit before features
Clarify the organisational problem, intended audience, change mechanism, work inputs and review approach before assessing a product list.
Keep claims proportionate
Provider statements, participant feedback and independent evaluation should remain distinguishable.
Intended organisational need
Delivery and participation
Evidence provenance
Implementation requirements
Frequently asked questions
Can programs be listed now?
No public marketplace is live. Program creators and providers can register research interest.
Will Shelby recommend a best program?
The proposed model compares contextual fit; it does not assume one program is universally best.
Does a wellbeing program satisfy WHS duties?
Not by itself. Organisations remain responsible for work health and safety duties and should obtain appropriate advice.